Is it ethical to charge for CMS when it is driven by WordPress?
Over the last couple of years I have learnt a lot about building web-sites and seo techniques to raise the profile of a web-site once you have it. One of the most important factors is content and keeping that content fresh. With this in mind I can see why people would want a web-site that has its own content management system so that they can regularly update information, add news, and fresh content as and when they have it. This all seems sensible to me.
I personally love using WordPress. It is very flexible in terms of layout, what you can add, how you can adjust images, the look and feel of posts, and then on the more technical side how you can optimise posts for seo purposes and for easy navigation within your site. It’s also very easy to use and requires no technical knowledge. Another thing that is great about WordPress is that it is FREE, or open source and people call it. You can host a blog on the WordPress web-site in which case the domain name will be yourdomain.wordpress, or you can download the software and install it on your server. Once you have done that you can even receive updates without having to do any technical stuff at all.
The reason why I mention this is that recently I have noticed several software developers offering low cost web-sites which have a full content management system. When I look at these, I realise that actually what they are offering, is a slightly customised front end to WordPress (which is free). Now if a company says “we take free / open source software called WordPress – design a front end for you – and there you have a web-site” and charges a price accordingly I think this is fair and transparent. But what about if a company uses WordPress, changes its name to something different, and then charges you a price, is that fair or transparent?
Open source software is often cutting edge and able to give as good a solution as expensive software. The people who write the software and develop it are not motivated by cash, but by having the credibility of saying “I wrote this, and look how many people are using it”. I do think that the people who have created this kind of software, perhaps without earning a salary for doing so, deserve a fair deal and recognition for their work. So, if your content management system looks like this, then it is almost certainly WordPress.

If everyone knows this, then I think you are probably using a great product, but if you haven’t been told this, perhaps you should ask your web-developer why not? And if you are buying a new web-site, don’t be afraid to ask, what am I paying for, who has done this, where does it come from, and why?

What a shame Norwich didn’t win the City of Culture bid.
Perhaps it is just one of those coincidences, but recently I have heard a lot of people talking about Rebranding. “We’re about to rebrand”, “We’ve just rebranded”, “We’re going through a rebrand” or my favourite “We rebranded a year ago, but it was a disaster so now are going to do it again”!!
There is much written about change. People who want us to change, things we want to change, and people perhaps we would like to change. Throughout the election campaign we seem to constantly be hearing about the need for change, the opportunity for change, and even when is the right time to change. Businesses are always grappling with change. As markets change businesses have to respond. Even the widest macro economic conditions are always changing, and these affect how markets behave, which in turn affects the way that organisations have to respond. Look at how cigarette companies have had to change their advertising and marketing over the last forty years – changing advertising styles, messages, and even markets. For a more current, more rapid example, look at how banks have had to change their products and branding to reflect both the products that they can actually offer and the reputation of their industry as a whole.
It is about 18 months since I first developed my Saturday Kitchen programme. The idea was and still is to offer people an affordable, focused, and individual session to help their business move forward through better marketing and business management. What is better Marketing? Well it is different for every organisation, but in essence, it means a clear sense of strategy led by insight, a clear plan which is affordable to the business, and a clear idea of what returns the marketing activities should bring into the business.
Why might someone in the private sector, a
Last week I was looking around the new parts of the Norwich Cathedral Building – The Reflectory!! What a terrific example of modern architecture responding and respecting what has been in place for many hundreds of years. The Cathedral is an iconic building in Norwich. It is a focus point for all kinds of reasons including religion, history, tourism, community, education and sport. With the recent improvements, restorations and new building, the Cathedral has added a local food focus and new ways for the community to use the buildings as place to meet and exchange and share ideas. It struck me that like so many organisations the Cathedral has a clear and obvious primary purpose, but by making the best of its resources (both people and buildings) it has been able to position itself at the very heart of the community it is striving to serve (as well as playing a big part in
Common Purpose took us over to Thetford last week. So what’s special about Thetford one might ask? Well, as I have driven past it so many times on my work to work or to business meetings I should probably know, but for whatever reason I have never been drawn to Thetford!
It’s over a year since I first started to build my web-site and since then I have learnt a lot. – It is a never ending piece of work, always building, trying to do more, adapting to new ideas and new technology. Keep an eye on my site for some new pages coming soon.
Yesterday was the second day of the Common Purpose matrix course in Norwich. For much of the day we were listening to leaders in the city and the challenges that they are currently facing. Perhaps one of the most interesting topics was the question of how a business built on the reputation of a founder can stretch the ethos and culture behind that individual to represent the whole business as it begins to evolve. Internal marketing and ensuring that people inside the organisation understand the brand as well as external stakeholders have become a growing part of the marketers role. I wonder how many people in large companies understand their brand to be the same as the understanding their customer have?