A Letter I Received From The RAC!
On Friday I received a letter from the RAC about a new home insurance product. But this isn’t strictly true. I didn’t receive a letter, I opened a letter that was addressed to Mr T Test, and actually there were two letters, another one, exactly the same was addressed to Mr T O’Test. I’m pretty sure Mr T Test and Mr T O’Test aren’t going to miss this kind of post so I opened the letter!!
At first glance I found these two letters rather amusing, but actually I think it really is rather concerning if you are any kind of stakeholder with the RAC…..
If you’re an employee it isn’t good. Somebody who works alongside you thinks Mr T Test lived at my address, is relaxed about writing to Mr T Test, and is even relaxed about writing twice to the same address on the same day about exactly the same thing. It’s bad news if you are a shareholder. One contributing factor to why your dividend couldn’t be a little higher is that the RAC is investing that money into writing to Mr T Test and Mr T O’test. It’s bad news is you’re a customer of the RAC too. A contributing factor to why your own experience isn’t even more amazing is because money has to be set aside for writing to Mr Test rather than allocating that money to you. Budgets have to be split between keeping customers and getting new ones like Mr Test.
Joking aside, I think this is a classic example of what happens when marketing goes wrong. What started out as a good idea to promote a new product has in my eyes, made the RAC look rather silly and not very good at direct marketing! If I had overall responsibility for this kind of activity I would be considering some of the following actions:-
- I would ask the people with overall responsibility for this kind of marketing how they let this happen. Round that table would be quite a lot of salary and overhead and some good brain power too, so I would ask why the database wasn’t simply de-duped and why isn’t there some kind of check to filter out obvious errors in the database records.
- I would try and quantify how many Mr Tests are out there and write letters of apology to the home owners for getting their names wrong. I would sign these personally rather than using a scanned signature.
- I would cut all marketing expenditure budgets by 5% and increase customer acquisition targets by 2%. If a manager told me this was not possible, I would suggest they stop writing to Mr Test as a starter for ten. Budgets that are too big breed a culture where writing to Mr Test is OK because it doesn’t really matter and nobody will know anyway.
- I would ask people much closer to the project detail if they really really care about the organisation and about the brand. Somebody somewhere has let this go in the post. Why? What does this really mean about how people feel towards their employer? It seems to me that somewhere in the process, the human passion for doing a good job has been lost and replaced with a marketing return on investment metric. If we send out 1000 letters, x will buy the product. But that analysis almost certainly hasn’t fully costed the Mr Test factor!
In a small business every customer matters and every penny spent matters. There is a burning desire amongst everybody to keep the business afloat, to make it a success. People are proud and passionate about what they do. People try desperately hard to make everything perfect every time and get frustrated when they fall even a tiny bit short of those exacting standards The challenge as you get bigger is to keep it that way and some companies seem better at this than others.
I wish the RAC well with their new product. Mr Test won’t be buying home insurance from them, but hopefully someone else will and they will get a good quality product I’m sure.













